NHL teams are rapidly approaching the halfway point of the 82-game season and we’re getting to the point where we know exactly how good most teams around the league are going to be. Some teams are destroying all preseason expectations, while some teams are just destroying their fans’ hopes and dreams. It seemed like a good time to stop and take a look at the standings in-depth to see if we could figure out what the heck is going on with the NHL this year.
We decided to project the records of all 30 teams through the end of the season. To come up with our projections, we took into account each team, their effectiveness both at home and on the road, and how many games they have left. First and foremost, here are the projections for all 30 teams, as well as their ranking within each conference.
Take a look at all the numbers we put together and then let us know what stats stick out to you. Do you see any trends here that you didn’t expect to see? Anything that makes you think you have the 2nd half figured out?
Eastern Conference Projections
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Goal Diff | Wins | Current Points | Proj Total Points | |
| 1 | PHI | East | 35 | 30 | 22 | 49 | 116 |
| 2 | PIT | East | 34 | 31 | 22 | 46 | 111 |
| 3 | TBL | East | 33 | -5 | 19 | 42 | 108 |
| 4 | ATL | East | 36 | 13 | 19 | 43 | 98 |
| 5 | WAS | East | 36 | 9 | 20 | 44 | 98 |
| 6 | BOS | East | 32 | 21 | 17 | 38 | 98 |
| 7 | NYR | East | 35 | 14 | 20 | 41 | 96 |
| 8 | MTL | East | 34 | 12 | 19 | 40 | 94 |
| 9 | CAR | East | 32 | -9 | 15 | 34 | 88 |
| 10 | FLA | East | 31 | 7 | 15 | 30 | 81 |
| 11 | BUF | East | 34 | -8 | 14 | 32 | 77 |
| 12 | OTT | East | 35 | -25 | 14 | 32 | 75 |
| 13 | TOR | East | 33 | -27 | 12 | 28 | 68 |
| 14 | NJ | East | 33 | -44 | 9 | 20 | 51 |
| 15 | NYI | East | 30 | -39 | 6 | 18 | 50 |
Western Conference Projections
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Goal Diff | Wins | Current Points | Proj Total Points | |
| 1 | DET | West | 32 | 17 | 20 | 44 | 112 |
| 2 | VAN | West | 31 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 111 |
| 3 | DAL | West | 34 | 8 | 21 | 45 | 109 |
| 4 | LA | West | 32 | 20 | 19 | 39 | 104 |
| 5 | NAS | West | 32 | 4 | 17 | 40 | 103 |
| 6 | COL | West | 34 | 11 | 19 | 42 | 102 |
| 7 | SJ | West | 34 | 7 | 18 | 41 | 99 |
| 8 | PHX | West | 32 | -4 | 15 | 37 | 95 |
| 9 | STL | West | 33 | -7 | 16 | 37 | 93 |
| 10 | CLB | West | 33 | -6 | 17 | 37 | 92 |
| 11 | CHI | West | 35 | 8 | 18 | 39 | 92 |
| 12 | ANA | West | 38 | -13 | 18 | 40 | 87 |
| 13 | MIN | West | 32 | -12 | 15 | 34 | 87 |
| 14 | EDM | West | 32 | -25 | 12 | 29 | 74 |
| 15 | CGY | West | 35 | -11 | 14 | 31 | 74 |
Some of the findings aren’t really all that surprising. We don’t need formulas or spreadsheets to tell us that the Philadelphia Flyers, Detroit Red Wings, and Pittsburgh Penguins are good teams. But did you know that the Vancouver Canucks are on pace to have as many points as the Pittsburgh Penguins (111)? Maybe it’s because their games start at 10:30pm ET or maybe it’s because they don’t have Sidney Crosby scoring in 908723 straight games, but somehow the Canucks have flown under the radar compared to the other elite teams. Just wait until they play a few more games and shoot up the overall standings. People like Mike Brophy will have an increasingly difficult time burying them in their power rankings.
As it stands right now, the average team has 17 wins in 33 games and has accumulated 37 points. In other words, your average team thus far is the Columbus Blue Jackets. Yes, really.
Something else to take into account is the goal differential each team has through 35 games or so. It’s pretty obvious that teams that consistently score more than their opponents over a long period of time will win more games than those that don’t. It’s not really rocket surgery. Of course winning a game 1-0 and 5-0 really doesn’t count for anything extra in the standings—thus it’s not an exact science. But for the most part, the past has shown us that goal differential is a very good predictor of the future. With that in mind, here are the differentials for each team in the NHL (normalized in regards to games played). Obviously, if you take the average of all 30 teams, it breaks down to 0.00. There’s your reference point to know if your team is doing well or not!
Goal Differential (Per Game)
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Goal Diff | Wins | Pts | Goal Diff per Game | |
| 1 | PIT | East | 34 | 31 | 22 | 46 | 0.91 |
| 2 | PHI | East | 35 | 30 | 22 | 49 | 0.86 |
| 3 | VAN | West | 31 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 0.74 |
| 4 | BOS | East | 32 | 21 | 17 | 38 | 0.66 |
| 5 | LA | West | 32 | 20 | 19 | 39 | 0.63 |
| 6 | DET | West | 32 | 17 | 20 | 44 | 0.53 |
| 7 | NYR | East | 35 | 14 | 20 | 41 | 0.40 |
| 8 | ATL | East | 36 | 13 | 19 | 43 | 0.36 |
| 9 | MTL | East | 34 | 12 | 19 | 40 | 0.35 |
| 10 | COL | West | 34 | 11 | 19 | 42 | 0.32 |
| 11 | WAS | East | 36 | 9 | 20 | 44 | 0.25 |
| 12 | DAL | West | 34 | 8 | 21 | 45 | 0.24 |
| 13 | CHI | West | 35 | 8 | 18 | 39 | 0.23 |
| 14 | FLA | East | 31 | 7 | 15 | 30 | 0.23 |
| 15 | SJ | West | 34 | 7 | 18 | 41 | 0.21 |
| 16 | NAS | West | 32 | 4 | 17 | 40 | 0.13 |
| 17 | PHX | West | 32 | -4 | 15 | 37 | -0.13 |
| 18 | TBL | East | 33 | -5 | 19 | 42 | -0.15 |
| 19 | CLB | West | 33 | -6 | 17 | 37 | -0.18 |
| 20 | STL | West | 33 | -7 | 16 | 37 | -0.21 |
| 21 | BUF | East | 34 | -8 | 14 | 32 | -0.24 |
| 22 | CAR | East | 32 | -9 | 15 | 34 | -0.28 |
| 23 | CGY | West | 35 | -11 | 14 | 31 | -0.31 |
| 24 | ANA | West | 38 | -13 | 18 | 40 | -0.34 |
| 25 | MIN | West | 32 | -12 | 15 | 34 | -0.38 |
| 26 | OTT | East | 35 | -25 | 14 | 32 | -0.71 |
| 27 | EDM | West | 32 | -25 | 12 | 29 | -0.78 |
| 28 | TOR | East | 33 | -27 | 12 | 28 | -0.82 |
| 29 | NYI | East | 30 | -39 | 6 | 18 | -1.30 |
| 30 | NJ | East | 33 | -44 | 9 | 20 | -1.33 |
Predictably, the Penguins, Flyers, Canucks, and Kings are up near the top of the league. The Boston Bruins also show that they’ve been one of the best teams in the league—but then again, a team will have a great goal differential when their goaltender never seems to give up any goals. Just as predictably, the Oilers, Maple Leafs, Islanders, and Devils are all at the bottom of the list. There’s a reason why people will use this measure to predict the rest of the season. Good teams do well, bad teams do poorly.
As interesting as the stat can be, it is an imperfect measure. Take a team like the Nashville Predators. They’re currently in the 6th spot in the Western Conference, they’re projected to earn 103 points, yet they still are in the bottom half of the NHL when it comes to this measure.
Regardless of statistics, we shouldn’t be a surprised that the Predators are performing well on the ice. Midway through December, they’re 1 of only 5 teams that had 100+ points last season and are on pace to do so again this year.
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Goal Diff | Wins | Pts | Proj Total Pts | Last Year Total Points |
| DET | West | 32 | 17 | 20 | 44 | 112 | 102 |
| PIT | East | 34 | 31 | 22 | 46 | 111 | 101 |
| VAN | West | 31 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 111 | 103 |
| LA | West | 32 | 20 | 19 | 39 | 104 | 101 |
| NAS | West | 32 | 4 | 17 | 40 | 103 | 100 |
Consistency is one thing, but improvement is quite another. The Predators are only marginally on pace for a better season thus far—but with their record, consistency is fine. When a team like the Ducks is rocking in the 87 point neighborhood, the last thing they want is consistency between seasons. They’re looking for improvement. With that in mind, here are the Top 5 teams in terms of improvement.
10 Most Improved Teams
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Goal Diff | Wins | Pts | Proj Total Pts | Last Year Total Points | Difference (Last Yr to This Yr) | |
| T1 | PHI | East | 35 | 30 | 22 | 49 | 116 | 88 | 28 |
| T1 | TBL | East | 33 | -5 | 19 | 42 | 108 | 80 | 28 |
| 3 | DAL | West | 34 | 8 | 21 | 45 | 109 | 88 | 21 |
| 4 | ATL | East | 36 | 13 | 19 | 43 | 98 | 83 | 15 |
| 5 | CLB | West | 33 | -6 | 17 | 37 | 92 | 79 | 13 |
| 6 | EDM | West | 32 | -25 | 12 | 29 | 74 | 62 | 12 |
| T7 | PIT | East | 34 | 31 | 22 | 46 | 111 | 101 | 10 |
| T7 | DET | West | 32 | 17 | 20 | 44 | 112 | 102 | 10 |
| 9 | NYR | East | 35 | 14 | 20 | 41 | 96 | 87 | 9 |
| T10 | CAR | East | 32 | -9 | 15 | 34 | 88 | 80 | 8 |
| T10 | VAN | West | 31 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 111 | 103 | 8 |
On the flip side, not everyone is improving this season. Some teams are having problems with painful rebuilds, some set an impossible standard last season, and others went out and signed Ilya Kovalchuk for 89% of their salary cap space during the offseason. Here are the 5 teams that have slipped the most this season.
5 Teams Struggling Compared to Last Year
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Goal Diff | Wins | Pts | Proj Total Pts | Last Year Total Points | Difference (Last Yr to This Yr) | |
| 26 | CHI | West | 35 | 8 | 18 | 39 | 92 | 112 | -20 |
| 27 | BUF | East | 34 | -8 | 14 | 32 | 77 | 100 | -23 |
| 28 | WAS | East | 36 | 9 | 20 | 44 | 98 | 121 | -23 |
| 29 | NYI | East | 30 | -39 | 6 | 18 | 50 | 79 | -29 |
| 30 | NJ | East | 33 | -44 | 9 | 20 | 51 | 103 | -52 |
One of the biggest coach clichés in hockey is “we have to take care of business at home.” Whether it’s the energy of the crowd, the last line change, or the advantage in the faceoff circle, most teams are better at home than they are on the road. When we were factoring in projections, we took into account each team’s schedule, how many games they’ve played at home, and the different success rates at home and on the road. If the playoffs were to start today, 14 of the top 15 teams at home would make the playoffs (special thanks to the St Louis Blues for having a good home record but landing 12th in the west). Since some teams have played more games at home and other have played more on the road, we worked the figures to be points-per-game at home. A perfect home record would be 2 points per game.
10 Best Home Teams
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Home Games Played | Home Game Points | Pts Per Game (Home) | Home Games Left | Proj Home Pts | Proj Total Pts | |
| 1 | LA | West | 32 | 14 | 23 | 1.64 | 27 | 67 | 104 |
| 2 | TBL | East | 33 | 14 | 22 | 1.57 | 27 | 64 | 108 |
| 3 | DAL | West | 34 | 17 | 26 | 1.53 | 24 | 63 | 109 |
| 4 | VAN | West | 31 | 16 | 24 | 1.50 | 25 | 62 | 111 |
| 5 | WAS | East | 36 | 20 | 29 | 1.45 | 21 | 59 | 98 |
| 6 | DET | West | 32 | 19 | 27 | 1.42 | 22 | 58 | 112 |
| 7 | NAS | West | 32 | 15 | 21 | 1.40 | 26 | 57 | 103 |
| 8 | STL | West | 33 | 16 | 22 | 1.38 | 25 | 56 | 93 |
| 9 | MTL | East | 34 | 19 | 26 | 1.37 | 22 | 56 | 94 |
| 10 | COL | West | 34 | 16 | 21 | 1.31 | 25 | 54 | 102 |
Something interesting is the difference between teams that are good at home and teams that are good on the road. Take the Los Angeles Kings for example. They’re the best team in the league at home; yet they’re only 22nd in the league on the road. In fact, they have the biggest gap between home and road productivity. These are the teams that are significantly better at home as opposed to the road.
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Pts Per Game (Home) | Pts Per Game (Away) | Home Games Left | Proj Home Pts | Diff (Home & Away Pts Per Gm) | |
| 1 | LA | West | 32 | 1.64 | 0.89 | 27 | 67 | 0.75 |
| 2 | TBL | East | 33 | 1.57 | 1.05 | 27 | 64 | 0.52 |
| 3 | WAS | East | 36 | 1.45 | 0.94 | 21 | 59 | 0.51 |
| 4 | STL | West | 33 | 1.38 | 0.88 | 25 | 56 | 0.49 |
| 5 | TOR | East | 33 | 1.06 | 0.60 | 23 | 43 | 0.46 |
| 6 | CGY | West | 35 | 1.13 | 0.68 | 25 | 46 | 0.44 |
| 7 | MTL | East | 34 | 1.37 | 0.93 | 22 | 56 | 0.44 |
| 8 | ANA | West | 38 | 1.28 | 0.85 | 23 | 52 | 0.43 |
| 9 | DAL | West | 34 | 1.53 | 1.12 | 24 | 63 | 0.41 |
| 10 | NJ | East | 33 | 0.80 | 0.44 | 26 | 33 | 0.36 |
Of course, the flipside of great home records is analysis of the road records. If a team can be productive on the road (where it’s much more difficult to win), conventional wisdom tells us these are teams capable of winning anywhere. These are teams that—whether they’re at the top of the league or not— have shown they have the potential to win difficult games in difficult atmospheres. After all, good teams are supposed to win at home. Great teams are the ones that expect to win on the road.
10 Best Road Teams
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Away Games Played | Away Games Points | Pts Per Game (Away) | Away Games Left | Proj Away Pts | Proj Total Pts | |
| 1 | PHI | East | 35 | 15 | 23 | 1.53 | 26 | 63 | 116 |
| 2 | PIT | East | 34 | 16 | 23 | 1.44 | 25 | 59 | 111 |
| 3 | NYR | East | 35 | 18 | 24 | 1.33 | 23 | 55 | 96 |
| 4 | DET | West | 32 | 13 | 17 | 1.31 | 28 | 54 | 112 |
| 5 | BOS | East | 32 | 15 | 19 | 1.27 | 26 | 52 | 98 |
| 6 | ATL | East | 36 | 17 | 21 | 1.24 | 24 | 51 | 98 |
| T7 | VAN | West | 31 | 15 | 18 | 1.20 | 26 | 49 | 111 |
| T7 | CLB | West | 33 | 15 | 18 | 1.20 | 26 | 49 | 92 |
| 9 | CHI | West | 35 | 16 | 19 | 1.19 | 25 | 49 | 92 |
| T10 | COL | West | 34 | 18 | 21 | 1.17 | 23 | 48 | 102 |
| T10 | PHX | West | 32 | 18 | 21 | 1.17 | 23 | 48 | 95 |
Not surprisingly, 3 of the 4 best teams in the league are also the best teams on the road. Interestingly enough, both of the streaking Pennsylvanian teams have been much better on the road than they have been in the familiar confines of their home arenas.
| Team | Conf | Games Played | Pts Per Game (Home) | Pts Per Game (Away) | Away Games Left | Proj Away Pts | Diff (Away & Home Pts Per Gm) | |
| 1 | NYR | East | 35 | 1.00 | 1.33 | 23 | 55 | 0.33 |
| 2 | PHI | East | 35 | 1.30 | 1.53 | 26 | 63 | 0.23 |
| 3 | PIT | East | 34 | 1.28 | 1.44 | 25 | 59 | 0.16 |
| 4 | BOS | East | 32 | 1.12 | 1.27 | 26 | 52 | 0.15 |
| 5 | CLB | West | 33 | 1.06 | 1.20 | 26 | 49 | 0.14 |
| 6 | CHI | West | 35 | 1.05 | 1.19 | 25 | 49 | 0.13 |
| 7 | ATL | East | 36 | 1.16 | 1.24 | 24 | 51 | 0.08 |
| 8 | EDM | West | 32 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 25 | 38 | 0.06 |
| 9 | PHX | West | 32 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 23 | 48 | 0.02 |
| 10 | MIN | West | 32 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 26 | 44 | 0.01 |
Not only are these the Top 10 teams in regards to road vs. home records, but these are also the only teams that have better records on the road. The rest of the NHL teams are better at home.
It’s striking to look at the New York Rangers and their Jekyll/Hyde-like personality away from Manhattan. Away from the Big Apple they look like one of the best teams in the league; but in New York, their record is pedestrian at best. The Rangers could be really good if they could figure out how to win at Madison Square Garden. Keep that in mind when you’re looking at sleeper teams to make a move in the 2nd half of the season. It’s a lot easier to learn how to win at home than it is to learn how to win on the road. If that holds true, the Rangers could make a push later this year.





